Cross-Examination In Alabama, cross-examination is a legal process in which a lawyer questions a witness who has already testified in court or in a deposition. Cross-examination is typically conducted by the opposing party’s attorney and is used to challenge the credibility, accuracy, and reliability of the witness’s testimony. During cross-examination in Alabama, the attorney conducting the questioning is allowed to ask leading questions, which are questions that suggest the desired answer. The purpose of leading questions is to challenge the witness’s version of events and to point out inconsistencies in their testimony. Cross-examination in Alabama is subject to the rules of evidence, which govern the admissibility of evidence in court. For example, an attorney cannot ask a witness about hearsay evidence or about matters that are irrelevant to the case. The judge presiding over the case has the discretion to limit or allow cross-examination as long as the attorney is following the rules of evidence. The judge may also intervene if the questioning becomes argumentative or harassing. Overall, cross-examination is an important part of the legal process in Alabama and can be an effective tool for challenging the testimony of witnesses and uncovering the truth.